Dairy farming

There is some difference within this overall trend between dairy and non-dairy breeds. The number of dairy females aged two years and over fell by just under two per cent whilst the number of non-dairy females in the same age group fell by over five per cent.
This means that the number of pigs in Wales at December 2011 (25,600) has more than halved since December 2000 (65,200).

The total number of cattle and calves has fallen by  over 10 per cent since December 2000. The breakdown  between dairy and  non-dairy is not possible over the whole period because of the change to  using data  from the Cattle Tracing System (CTS). The data collected  for CTS is different from what used to be  collected via the December  survey, thus not allowing direct comparisons.  
Over the period 2004 to 2011 (the years for which CTS data is available)  comparisons can be made. This  showed an overall decrease in the total  number of cattle and calves of 13 per cent. Comparisons of the  number  of females aged over 2 years (those animals used for breeding and of  most interest) showed a  smaller fall in dairy breeds (10 per cent) than  for non-dairy breeds (14 per cent). 
One possible contributory reason for this  is  that  market  forces   have benefitted farmers not retaining as  many females for breeding in  the future and instead fattening more for sale for beef production. The   switch from Single Farm Payments being based partly on numbers of  livestock (in 2005) could be  another contributory factor in the general  fall in numbers.  
Details of cattle births, deaths and movements are  collected and stored  on the Cattle Tracing System  (CTS), primarily for use for animal  health purposes. As with all new systems, there were teething   difficulties when it was first introduced. Since 2004, however, it is  possible to extract data which is felt to  be comparable with December  Survey estimates but only for total cattle and calves (definitional   differences prevent it in any more detail). Where data from both sources  is available (2004, 2005 and  2006), it can be seen from the chart  above that there are differences between the two.  The main reason  for  this is that the survey produces an estimate which is prone to  statistical error. As the sample size for  the December Survey of  Agriculture is relatively small, these errors are statistically more  likely to be  larger than on a larger survey.  In addition the CTS is  intended to be a definitive record which should be  more accurate than a  survey estimate.

Further Reading
| - | You can view the full report by clicking here. | 






















