World Markets

It is not Canada's trade stance that is hypocritical.  While Canada has a great deal of export interests in agriculture  (world's 4th largest exporter), Canada is also the 6th largest importer  of agricultural products.
“Yes, but what about Canada's supply-managed sectors,” you ask. Well,  contrary to the perpetuation of the trade hypocrisy myth put out by  people like Tim Groser, as quoted in your editorial, Canada is not a  closed market for dairy and poultry. Canada is the 16th largest importer  of chicken in the world and the 3rd most valuable market for US chicken  exports.
Where does free trading New Zealand stand in the rank of global chicken  imports? At or near the bottom. Why? It is not because New Zealanders  would not like to be able to buy high quality chicken. It is because New  Zealand does not allow chicken to be imported. It is illegal to import  raw poultry, fresh or frozen into New Zealand.
We live next door to the largest poultry producer in the world. New  Zealand hides behind its natural trade barrier of being a small market  12,000 kms away from any competition. And if that is not enough, it  hides behind its pristine biosecurity claims to ensure it has no  competition.
Supply management has never stood in the way of Canada successfully  negotiating any trade agreements with other countries. In fact, the  Canadian government has successfully negotiated the WTO Uruguay Round  and nine other trade agreements since 1994, which have all opened up  markets while preserving supply management.
As far as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) is concerned, no supply  managed commodity has any objections to Canada entering into the  negotiations. We expect that the government will be able to negotiate a  TPP agreement that benefits all of Canadian agriculture.
Canada: Not a Closed Market
When critics argue that Canada stands alone with supply management, it  is because we stand alone in providing clean, consistent and transparent  access to our market, while other countries hide behind phony  non-tariff barriers. While many countries have implemented protectionist  measures in the past two years, Canada has maintained the access it has  always provided to its chicken market; access that is almost twice our  WTO commitment.
Tariffs Don’t Make Canadian Chicken More Expensive
Ms. Johnston speaks about the tariffs within the supply management  system in Canada. For chicken, the reality is that nobody pays the  over-quota tariff. All our imports enter Canada at the in-quota duty  which ranges from 0 to five per cent. The purpose of the over-quota  tariff is simply to determine the volume of chicken imports that enter  Canada.
The tariff rate quota provides certainty to both exporters and the  domestic industry. Exporters benefit from consistent access to the  Canadian market, without any of the games that other countries play in  order to limit access by other means. The chicken industry benefits from  the certainty of the level of imports, which allows the Canadian  chicken industry to plan its production accordingly to meet consumer  demand.
Cost of Food – Consumers Don’t Pay More Because of Supply Management
Let's be clear - Canadians get great value for the food they consume.  Canadians only spend about 10 per cent of their disposable income on  food. Still, we regularly deal with claims from journalists who believe  that consumers pay higher prices for their products as a direct result  of supply management. 
Supply management isn’t to blame for food prices. Dismantling it won’t  help anybody. In countries where industries have been deregulated,  farmers’ incomes have dropped substantially, while consumer prices have  not followed suit.
Chicken farmers do not set retail prices. Those are set by retailers.  The price of chicken varies widely from week to week, from region to  region, from store to store and from product to product.
As the live price that farmers receive for their chicken is only a small  portion of what consumers pay for chicken, getting rid of supply  management will not translate into a benefit for consumers. The farmer  share of a restaurant meal is about 10 per cent or less of the menu  price of the item. 
When you add in the taxes and tip, the farmer share shrinks even  further. In fact, the waiter's tip is usually larger than what the  farmer receives – and all he or she did was walk your food to the table.
It’s easy to sit back and make judgements from a position when you’re  thousands of kilometres away from your nearest competition. When critics  argue that Canada stands alone with supply management, it is because we  stand alone in providing clean, consistent and transparent access to  our market, with no government subsidies, while other countries hide  behind phony non-tariff barriers.
Further Reading
| - | Go to our previous news item on this story by clicking here. | 






















